Paper detail

The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function

We present a clustering analysis of QSOs using over 20000 objects from the final catalogue of the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ), measuring the z-space correlation function, xi(s). When averaged over the range 0.3<z<2.2 we find that xi(s) is flat on small scales, steepening on scales above ~25h-1Mpc. In a WMAP/2dF cosmology we find a best fit power law with s_0=5.48+0.42-0.48h-1Mpc and gamma=1.20+-0.10 on scales s=1-25h-1Mpc. A CDM model assuming WMAP/2dF cosmological parameters is a good description of the QSO xi(s) after accounting for non-linear clustering and z-space distortions, and a linear bias of b_qso(z=1.35)=2.02+-0.07. We subdivide the 2QZ into 10 redshift intervals from z=0.53 to 2.48 and find a significant increase in clustering amplitude at high redshift in the WMAP/2dF cosmology. We derive the bias of the QSOs which is a strong function of redshift with b_qso(z=0.53)=1.13+-0.18 and b_qso(z=2.48)=4.24+-0.53. We use these bias values to derive the mean dark matter halo (DMH) mass occupied by the QSOs. At all redshifts 2QZ QSOs inhabit approximately the same mass DMHs with M_DH=(3.0+-1.6)x10^12h-1M_sun, which is close to the characteristic mass in the Press-Schechter mass function, M*, at z=0. If the relation between black hole (BH) mass and M_DH or host velocity dispersion does not evolve, then we find that the accretion efficiency (L/L_edd) for L* QSOs is approximately constant with redshift. Thus the fading of the QSO population from z~2 to 0 appears to be due to less massive BHs being active at low redshift. We apply different methods to estimate, t_qso, the active lifetime of QSOs and constrain this to be in the range 4x10^6-6x10^8 years at z~2. (Abridged).

preprint2004arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.