Paper detail

The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The population of nearby radio galaxies at the 1 mJy level

We use redshift determinations and spectral analysis of galaxies in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey to study the properties of local radio sources with $S\ge 1$ mJy. 557 objects drawn from the FIRST survey, corresponding to 2.3 per cent of the total radio sample, are found in the 2dFGRS cataloge within the area $9^h 48^m \simlt {\rm RA}({\rm 2000}) \simlt 14^h 32^m$ and $-2.77^\circ \simlt {\rm dec}({\rm 2000}) \simlt 2.25^\circ$, down to a magnitude limit $b_J= 19.45$. The excellent quality of 2dF spectra allows us to divide these sources into classes, according to their optical spectra. Radio galaxies (i.e. absorption systems, mainly belonging to the class of FR I sources, whose spectra may or may not show emission lines due to AGN activity) make up 63 per cent of the spectroscopic sample; they are characterized by relatively high radio-to-optical ratios, red colours and luminosities $10^{21}\simlt P_{1.4{\rm GHz}} W Hz^${-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ \simlt 10^{24}$. Actively star-forming galaxies instead contribute with 30 per cent to the total sample. These objects -- principally found at low redshifts ($z \simlt 0.1$) -- in general show low radio-to-optical ratios, blue colours and low radio luminosities. We also found 18 Seyfert 2 galaxies and 4 Seyfert 1's. Analysis of the local radio luminosity function shows that radio galaxies are well described by models that assume pure luminosity evolution, at least down to radio powers $P_{1.4{\rm GHz}}\simlt 10^{20.5} W Hz$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ Late-type galaxies, whose relative contribution to the RLF is found to be lower than was predicted by previous work, present a luminosity function which is compatible with the IRAS galaxy LF, and therefore plausibly constitute the radio counterpart of the dusty spirals and starbursts that dominate the counts at 60 $μ$m.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access24 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.