Paper detail

The 21 cm-kSZ-kSZ Bispectrum during the Epoch of Reionization

The high-redshift 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) is a promising observational probe of the early universe. Current- and next-generation radio interferometers such as the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA) and Square Kilometre Array (SKA) are projected to measure the 21 cm auto power spectrum from the EoR. Another observational signal of this era is the kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) signal in the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which will be observed by the upcoming Simons Observatory (SO) and CMB-S4 experiments. The 21 cm signal and the contribution to the kSZ from the EoR are expected to be anti-correlated, the former coming from regions of neutral gas in the intergalactic medium and the latter coming from ionized regions. However, the naive cross-correlation between the kSZ and 21 cm maps suffers from a cancellation that occurs because ionized regions are equally likely to be moving toward or away from the observer and so there is no net correlation with the 21 cm signal. We present here an investigation of the 21 cm-kSZ-kSZ bispectrum, which should not suffer the same cancellation as the simple two-point cross-correlation. We show that there is a significant and non-vanishing signal that is sensitive to the reionization history, suggesting the statistic may be used to confirm or infer the ionization fraction as a function of redshift. In the absence of foreground contamination, we forecast that this signal is detectable at high statistical significance with HERA and SO. The bispectrum we study suffers from the fact that the kSZ signal is sensitive only to Fourier modes with long-wavelength line-of-sight components, which are generally lost in the 21 cm data sets owing to foreground contamination. We discuss possible strategies for alleviating this contamination, including an alternative four-point statistic that may help circumvent this issue.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.