Paper detail

The 2015 hard-state only outburst of GS 1354-64

Since its outburst in 1997 GS 135-64 stayed in quiescence. In June 2015 renewed activity of GS 1354-64 was observed. Based on our analysis of energy spectra and timing properties obtained from Swift/XRT monitoring data we found that GS 1354-64 stayed in the hard state during the entire outburst. Such a hard state only (or "failed" outburst) has also been observed in 1997. In addition, we analysed an XMM-Newton observation taken on August 6th. We compared variability on long and short time scales using covariance ratio and found that the ratio showed a decrease towards lower energies instead of the increase that has been found in other black hole X-ray binaries. There are now two sources (H 1743-322 and GS 1354-64) that do not show an increase towards lower energies in their covariance ratio. Both sources have been observed during "failed" outbursts and showed photon indices much harder than what is usually observed in black hole X-ray binaries.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.