Paper detail

The 2009 outburst from the new X-ray transient and black-hole candidate XTE J1652$-$453

The RXTE and Swift observations on the 2009 outburst from a newly discovered transient and black-hole candidate XTE J1652$-$453 are analyzed. The source was observed by RXTE to behave a sequence of spectral states that are typical to the black hole XRBs. During the first 7 observations, the source is diagnosed to stay in a high/soft state, from the spectrum dominated by soft thermal component which contributes an average of $\sim$ 85% to the X-ray flux at 2-20keV, and from the hardness $\sim$ 0.1 showing up in the hardness-intensity diagram (HID). For the last 20 observations the spectral state is classified as {\sl low/hard} according to an average hardness of $\sim$ 0.8 and a balance between the thermal and the non-thermal components: a power-law component takes ${\geq}80%$ of total 2-20keV flux. Located in between is an {\sl intermediate} state that the source might have experienced. The usual relationship between rms and hardness presents in HRD as well. Throughout the outburst no QPOs are found in XTE J1652$-$453.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.