Paper detail

The 2-surviving rate of planar graphs with average degree lower than $4\frac{1}{2}$

Let $G$ be any connected graph on $n$ vertices, $n \ge 2.$ Let $k$ be any positive integer. Suppose that a fire breaks out at some vertex of $G.$ Then, in each turn firefighters can protect at most $k$ vertices of $G$ not yet on fire; Next the fire spreads to all unprotected neighbours. The $k$-surviving rate of G, denoted by $ρ_k(G),$ is the expected fraction of vertices that can be saved from the fire, provided that the starting vertex is chosen uniformly at random. In this note, it is shown that for any planar graph $G$ with average degree $4\frac{1}{2} - ε,$ where $ε\in (0, 1],$ we have $ρ_2(G) \ge \frac{2}{9}ε$. In particular, the result implies a significant improvement of the bound for 2-surviving rate for triangle-free planar graphs (Esperet, van den Heuvel, Maffray and Sipma, 2013) and for planar graphs without 4-cycles (Kong, Wang, Zhang, 2012). The proof is done using the separator theorem for planar graphs. This paper is the corrected version of (Gordinowicz, 2018) unified with the corrigendum.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.