Paper detail

The 2-Ranking Numbers of Graphs

In a graph whose vertices are assigned integer ranks, a path is well-ranked if the endpoints have distinct ranks or some interior point has a higher rank than the endpoints. A ranking is an assignment of ranks such that all nontrivial paths are well-ranked. A $k$-ranking is a relaxation in which all nontrivial paths of length at most $k$ are well-ranked. The $k$-ranking number of a graph $G$ is the minimum $t$ such that there is a $k$-ranking of $G$ using ranks in $\{1,\ldots,t\}$. We prove that the $2$-ranking number of the $n$-dimensional hypercube $Q_n$ is $n+1$. As a corollary, we improve the bounds on the star chromatic number of products of cycles when each cycle has length divisible by $4$. For $m\le n$, we show that the $2$-ranking number of $K_m \mathop\square K_n$ is $Ω(n\log m)$ and $O(nm^{\log_2(3)-1})$ with an asymptotic result when $m$ is constant and an exact result when $m!$ divides $n$. We prove that every subcubic graph has $2$-ranking number at most $7$, and we also prove the existence of a graph with maximum degree $k$ and $2$-ranking number $Ω(k^2/\log(k))$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.