Paper detail

The 2-page crossing number of $K_n$

Around 1958, Hill described how to draw the complete graph $K_n$ with [Z(n) :=1/4\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-2}{2}% \rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor] crossings, and conjectured that the crossing number $\crg (K_{n})$ of $K_n$ is exactly Z(n). This is also known as Guy's conjecture as he later popularized it. Towards the end of the century, substantially different drawings of $K_{n}$ with Z(n) crossings were found. These drawings are \emph{2-page book drawings}, that is, drawings where all the vertices are on a line $\ell$ (the spine) and each edge is fully contained in one of the two half-planes (pages) defined by $\ell$. The \emph{2-page crossing number} of $K_{n} $, denoted by $ν_{2}(K_{n})$, is the minimum number of crossings determined by a 2-page book drawing of $K_{n}% $. Since $\crg(K_{n}) \leν_{2}(K_{n})$ and $ν_{2}(K_{n}) \le Z(n)$, a natural step towards Hill's Conjecture is the %(formally) weaker conjecture $ν_{2}(K_{n}) = Z(n)$, popularized by Vrt'o. %As far as we know, this natural %conjecture was first raised by Imrich Vrt'o in 2007. %Prior to this paper, results known for $ν_2(K_n)$ were basically %the same as for $\crg (K_n)$. Here In this paper we develop a novel and innovative technique to investigate crossings in drawings of $K_{n}$, and use it to prove that $ν_{2}(K_{n}) = Z(n) $. To this end, we extend the inherent geometric definition of $k$-edges for finite sets of points in the plane to topological drawings of $K_{n}$. We also introduce the concept of ${\leq}{\leq}k$-edges as a useful generalization of ${\leq}k$-edges and extend a powerful theorem that expresses the number of crossings in a rectilinear drawing of $K_{n}$ in terms of its number of $(\le k)$-edges to the topological setting.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.