Paper detail

The 1996-1997 Fading of V651 Mon, the Binary Central Star of the Planetary Nebula NGC 2346

V651 Mon is the binary central star of the bipolar planetary nebula NGC 2346. The star showed the second-ever deep fading in 1996-1997, which was presumably caused by obscuration by a dust cloud in the planetary nebula, as was proposed to explain the 1981-1985 event. The entire duration of the 1996-1997 event was \~400 d, remarkably shorter than the 1981-1985 event, suggesting that the obscuring body was smaller or had a larger tangential velocity. The most remarkable feature in this event was the presence of a sharply defined transient clearing (brightening). From the time-scale of the variation, we propose an upper limit of the projected scale of several times ~10^11 cm of the structure responsible for the brightening. This observation provides the first evidence for a sharply defined, small lucent structure within the obscuring body around the central star of NGC 2346

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.