Paper detail

Text-free non-parallel many-to-many voice conversion using normalising flows

Non-parallel voice conversion (VC) is typically achieved using lossy representations of the source speech. However, ensuring only speaker identity information is dropped whilst all other information from the source speech is retained is a large challenge. This is particularly challenging in the scenario where at inference-time we have no knowledge of the text being read, i.e., text-free VC. To mitigate this, we investigate information-preserving VC approaches. Normalising flows have gained attention for text-to-speech synthesis, however have been under-explored for VC. Flows utilize invertible functions to learn the likelihood of the data, thus provide a lossless encoding of speech. We investigate normalising flows for VC in both text-conditioned and text-free scenarios. Furthermore, for text-free VC we compare pre-trained and jointly-learnt priors. Flow-based VC evaluations show no degradation between text-free and text-conditioned VC, resulting in improvements over the state-of-the-art. Also, joint-training of the prior is found to negatively impact text-free VC quality.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.