Paper detail

Tetraquark state candidates: $Y(4260)$, $Y(4360)$, $Y(4660)$ and $Z_c(4020/4025)$

In this article, we construct the axialvector-diquark-axialvector-antidiquark type tensor current to interpolate both the vector and axialvector tetraquark states, then calculate the contributions of the vacuum condensates up to dimension-10 in the operator product expansion, and obtain the QCD sum rules for both the vector and axialvector tetraquark states. The numerical results support assigning the $Z_c(4020/4025)$ to be the $J^{PC}=1^{+-}$ diquark-antidiquark type tetraquark state, and assigning the $Y(4660)$ to be the $J^{PC}=1^{--}$ diquark-antidiquark type tetraquark state. Furthermore, we take the $Y(4260)$ and $Y(4360)$ as the mixed charmonium-tetraquark states, and construct the two-quark-tetraquark type tensor currents to study the masses and pole residues. The numerical results support assigning the $Y(4260)$ and $Y(4360)$ to be the mixed charmonium-tetraquark states.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.