Paper detail

Tests of the Einstein Equivalence Principle using TeV Blazars

The observed time delays between different energy bands from TeV blazars provide a new interesting way of testing the Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP). If the whole time delay is assumed to be dominated by the gravitational field of the Milky Way, the conservative upper limit on the EEP can be estimated. Here we show that the strict limits on the differences of the parameterized post-Newtonian parameter $γ$ values are $γ_{\rm TeV}-γ_{\rm keV}<3.86\times10^{-3}$ for Mrk 421 and $γ_{\rm TeV}-γ_{\rm keV}<4.43\times10^{-3}$ for Mrk 501, while expanding the scope of the tested EEP energy range out to the TeV--keV range for the first time. With the small time lag from the 0.2--0.8 TeV and $>0.8$ TeV light curves of PKS 2155-304, a much more severe constraint on $γ$ differences of $\sim10^{-6}$ can be achieved, although the energy difference is of order of $\sim$ TeV. Furthermore, we can combine these limits on the energy dependence of $γ$ with the bound on the absolute $γ$ value $γ-1\sim0.3\%$ from light deflection measurements at the optical (eV) bands, and conclude that this absolute bound on $γ$ can be extended from optical to TeV energies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.