Paper detail

Tests of CPT and Lorentz symmetry from muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment

We derive the relativistic factor for splitting of the $g$-factors of a fermion and its anti-fermion partner, which is important for placing constraints on dimension-5, $CPT$-odd and Lorentz-invariance-violating interactions from experiments performed in a cyclotron. From existing data, we extract limits (1$σ$) on the coupling strengths of the temporal component, $f^0$, of a background field (including the field amplitude), which is responsible for such $g$-factor splitting, with an electron, proton, and muon: $|f^0_e|< 2.3 \times 10^{-12} ~μ_{\textrm{B}}$, $|f^0_p|< 4 \times 10^{-9} ~μ_{\textrm{B}}$, and $|f^0_μ|< 8 \times 10^{-11} ~μ_{\textrm{B}}$, respectively, in the laboratory frame. From existing data, we also extract limits on the coupling strengths of the spatial components, $d^{\perp}$, of related dimension-5 interactions of a background field with an electron, proton, neutron, and muon: $| {d}_e^{\perp} | \lesssim 10^{-9} ~μ_{\textrm{B}}$, $| {d}_p^{\perp} | \lesssim 10^{-9} ~μ_{\textrm{B}}$, $| {d}_n^{\perp} | \lesssim 10^{-10} ~μ_{\textrm{B}}$, and $| {d}_μ^{\perp} | \lesssim 10^{-9} ~μ_{\textrm{B}}$, respectively, in the laboratory frame.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.