Paper detail

Tests for Standard Accretion Disk Models by Variability in Active Galactic Nuclei

In this paper, standard accretion disk models of AGNs are tested using light curves of 26 objects well observed for reverberation mapping. Time scales of variations are estimated by the most common definition of the variability time scale and the zero-crossing time of the autocorrelation function of the optical light curves for each source. The measured time scales of variations by the two methods are consistent with each other. If the typical value of the viscosity parameter $α\sim 0.1$ is adopted, the measured optical variability time scales are most close to the thermal time scales of the standard disks. If $α$ is allowed to range from $\sim 0.03$ to $\sim 0.2$, the measured time scales are consistent with the thermal time scales of the standard disks. There is a linear relation between the measured variability time scales and black hole masses, and this linear relation is qualitatively consistent with expectation of the standard accretion disk models. The time lags measured by the ZDCF between different bands are on the order of days. The measured time lags of NGC 4151 and NGC 7469 are marginally consistent with the time lags estimated in the case of continuum thermal reprocessing for the standard accretion disk models. However, the measured time lags of NGC 5548 and Fairall 9 are unlikely to be the case of continuum thermal reprocessing. Our results are unlikely to be inconsistent with or are likely to be conditionally in favor of the standard accretion disk models of AGNs.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.