Paper detail

Testing X-ray Measurements of Galaxy Cluster Gas Mass Fraction Using the Cosmic Distance-Duality Relation

We propose a consistency test of some recent X-ray gas mass fraction ($f_{\rm{gas}}$) measurements in galaxy clusters, using the cosmic distance-duality relation, $η_{\rm{theory}}=\dl(1+z)^{-2}/\da$, with luminosity distance ($\dl$) data from the Union2 compilation of type Ia supernovae. We set $η_{\rm{theory}}\equiv1$, instead of assigning any redshift parameterizations to it, and constrain the cosmological information preferred by $f_{\rm{gas}}$ data along with supernova observations. We adopt a new binning method in the reduction of the Union2 data, in order to minimize the statistical errors. Four data sets of X-ray gas mass fraction, which are reported by Allen et al. (2 samples), LaRoque et al. and Ettori et al., are detailedly analyzed against two theoretical modelings of $f_{\rm{gas}}$. The results from the analysis of Allen et al.'s samples prove the feasibility of our method. It is found that the preferred cosmology by LaRoque et al.'s sample is consistent with its reference cosmology within 1-$σ$ confidence level. However, for Ettori et al.'s $f_{\rm{gas}}$ sample, the inconsistency can reach more than 3-$σ$ confidence level and this dataset shows special preference to an $\Ol=0$ cosmology.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.