Paper detail

Testing two-component jet models of GRBs with orphan afterglows

In the \swift era, two-component jet models were introduced to explain the complex temporal profiles and the diversity of early afterglows. In this paper, we concentrate on the two-component jet model; first component is the conventional afterglow and second is the emission due to the late internal dissipation such as the late-prompt emission. We suggest herein that the two-component jet model can be probed by the existence of two optical peaks for orphan GRB afterglows. Each peak is caused by its respective jet as its relativistic beaming cone widens to encompass the off-axis line of sight. Typically, the first peak appears at $10^4-10^5$ s and the second at $10^5-10^6$ s. Furthermore, we expect to observe a single, bright X-ray peak at the same time as the first optical peak. Because orphan afterglows do not have prompt emission, it is necessary to monitor the entire sky every $10^4$ s in the X-ray regime. We can test the model with orphan afterglows through the X-ray all-sky survey collaboration and by using ground-based optical telescopes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.