Paper detail

Testing three derivative methods of stellar population synthesis models

The number of methods used to study the properties of galaxies is increased, and testing these methods is very important. Galactic globular clusters (GCs) provide an excellent medium for such test, because they can be considered as simple stellar populations. We present ages and metallicities for 40 Galactic GCs as determined from three publicly available techniques, including colour, Lick-index and spectrum-fitting methods, based on Bruzual & Charlot evolutionary population synthesis (EPS) models. By comparing with the ages obtained from colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) and metallicities obtained from spectra of stars, we are able to estimate the ability of 'these methods on determination of GCs parameters, which is absolutely necessary. As a result, we find that: (i) for the metallicity, our derived metallicities agree with those derived from the spectra of stars, Lick-index method is suitable to study metallicity for the stellar population systems in the range of -1.5=<[Fe/H]=<-0.7 and spectrum- fitting method is suitable to study metallicity for the stellar population systems in the range of -2.3=<[Fe/H]=<-1.5; (ii) for the age, these three methods have difficulties in age determination, our derived ages are smaller (about 2.0 Gyr, on average) than the results of CMDs for all these three methods. We use Vazdekis and Maraston models to analyze whether our results are dependent on EPS models, and find that the tendency of these two models is the same as that of Bruzual & Charlot models. Our results are independent of the EPS models. In addition, our test is based on the old GCs and our conclusions may hold for old stellar population systems. The whole abstract can be found in my PDF version.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.