Paper detail

Testing the wavelength dependence of cosmological redshift down to $Δz \sim 10^{-6}$

At the core of the standard cosmological model lies the assumption that the redshift of distant galaxies is independent of photon wavelength. This invariance of cosmological redshift with wavelength is routinely found in all galaxy spectra with a precision of $Δ$z~10$^{-4}$. The combined use of approximately half a million high-quality galaxy spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) allows us to explore this invariance down to a nominal precision in redshift of one part per million (statistical). Our analysis is performed over the redshift interval 0.02<z<0.25. We use the centroids of spectral lines over the 3700-6800Å rest-frame optical window. We do not find any difference in redshift between the blue and red sides down to a precision of 10$^{-6}$ at z<0.1 and 10$^{-5}$ at 0.1<z<0.25 (i.e. at least an order of magnitude better than with single galaxy spectra). This is the first time the wavelength-independence of the (1+z) redshift law is confirmed over a wide spectral window at this precision level. This result holds independently of the stellar population of the galaxies and their kinematical properties. This result is also robust against wavelength calibration issues. The limited spectral resolution (R~2000) of the SDSS data combined with the asymmetric wavelength sampling of the spectral features in the observed restframe due to the (1+z) stretching of the lines prevent our methodology to achieve a precision higher than 10$^{-5}$, at z>0.1. Future attempts to constrain this law will require high quality galaxy spectra at higher resolution (R>10,000).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.