Paper detail

Testing the validity of the phenomenological gravitational waveform models for nonspinning binary black hole searches at low masses

The phenomenological gravitational waveform models, which we refer to as PhenomA, PhenomB and PhenomC, generate full inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms of coalescing binary back holes (BBHs). These models are defined in the Fourier domain, thus can be used for fast matched filtering in the gravitational wave search. PhenomA has been developed for nonspinning BBH waveforms, while PhenomB and PhenomC were designed to model the waveforms of BBH systems with nonprecessing (aligned) spins, but can also be used for nonspinning systems. In this work, we study the validity of the phenomenological models for nonspinning BBH searches at low masses, $m_{1,2}\geq 4 Msun$ and $m_1+m_2\equiv M \leq 30 Msun$, with Advanced LIGO. As our complete signal waveform model, we adopt EOBNRv2 that is a time-domain inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model. To investigate the search efficiency of the phenomenological template models, we calculate fitting factors by exploring overlap surfaces. We find that only PhenomC is valid to obtain the fitting factors better than 0.97 in the mass range of $M<15 Msun$. Above $15 Msun$, PhenomA is most efficient in symmetric mass region, PhenomB is most efficient in highly asymmetric mass region, and PhenomC is most efficient in the intermediate region. Specifically, we propose an effective phenomenological template family that can be constructed by employing the phenomenological models in four subregions individually. We find that fitting factors of the effective templates are better than 0.97 in our entire mass region and mostly greater than 0.99.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.