Paper detail

Testing the universality of the IMF with Bayesian statistics: young clusters

The universality of the stellar initial mass function (IMF) is tested using Bayesian statistics with a sample of eight young Galactic stellar clusters (IC 348, ONC, NGC 2024, NGC 6611, NGC 2264, $ρ$ Ophiuchi, Chameleon I, and Taurus). We infer the posterior probability distribution function (pPDF) of the IMF parameters when the likelihood function is described by a tapered power law function, a lognormal distribution at low masses coupled to a power law at higher masses, and a multi-component power law function. The inter-cluster comparison of the pPDFs of the IMF parameters for each likelihood function shows that these distributions do not overlap within the $1σ$ uncertainty level. Furthermore, the most probable values of the IMF parameters for most of the clusters deviate substantially from their values for the Galactic field stellar IMF. We also quantify the effects of taking into account the completeness correction as well as the uncertainties on the measured masses. The inclusion of the former affects the inferred pPDFs of the slope of the IMF at the low mass end while considering the latter affects the pPDFs of the slope of the IMF in the intermediate- to high mass regime. As variations are observed in all of the IMF parameters at once and for each of the considered likelihood functions, even for completeness corrected samples, we argue that the observed variations are real and significant, at least for the sample of eight clusters considered in this work. The results presented here clearly show that the IMF is not universal.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.