Paper detail

Testing the Turbulent Origin of the Stellar Initial Mass Function

Supersonic turbulence in the interstellar medium (ISM) is closely linked to the formation of stars, and hence many theories connect the stellar initial mass function (IMF) with the turbulent properties of molecular clouds. Here we test three turbulence-based IMF models (by Padoan & Nordlund 2002, Hennebelle & Chabrier 2008, and Hopkins 2012), which predict the relation between the high-mass slope ($Γ$) of the IMF, $\mathrm{d} N/\mathrm{d} \log M \propto M^Γ$ and the exponent n of the velocity power spectrum of turbulence, $E_v(k)\propto k^{-n} $, where $n\approx 2$ corresponds to typical ISM turbulence. Using hydrodynamic simulations, we drive turbulence with an unusual index of $n\approx 1$, measure $Γ$, and compare the results with $n\approx 2$. We find that reducing $n$ from 2 to 1 primarily changes the high-mass region of the IMF (beyond the median mass), where we measure high-mass slopes within the 95 per cent confidence interval of $-1.5<Γ<-1$ for $n \approx 1$ and $-3.7<Γ<-2.4$ for $n\approx 2$, respectively. Thus, we find that $n=1$ results in a significantly flatter high-mass slope of the IMF, with more massive stars formed than for $n \approx 2$. We compare these simulations with the predictions of the three IMF theories. We find that while the Padoan & Nordlund theory matches our simulations with fair accuracy, the other theories either fail to reproduce the main qualitative outcome of the simulations or require some modifications. We conclude that turbulence plays a key role in shaping the IMF, with a shallower turbulence power spectrum producing a shallower high-mass IMF, and hence more massive stars.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.