Paper detail

Testing the third body hypothesis in the Cataclysmic Variables LU Camelopardalis, QZSerpentis, V1007 Herculis and BK Lyncis

Some Cataclysmic Variables (CVs) exhibits a very long photometric period (VLPP). We calculate the properties of a hypothetical third body, initially assumed on circular--planar orbit, by matching the modelled VLPP to the observed one of four CVs studied here: {\sl LU Camelopardalis} (LU Cam), QZ Serpentis (QZ Ser), V1007 Herculis (V1007 Her) and BK Lyncis (BK Lyn). The eccentric and low inclination orbits for a third body are considered using analytical results. The chosen parameters of the binary components are based on the orbital period of each CV. The smallest corresponding semi-major axis permitted before the third body's orbit becomes unstable is also calculated. A first-order analytical post-Newtonian correction is applied, and the rate of precession of the pericentre is found, but it can not explain any of the observed VLPP. For the first time, we also estimate the effect of secular perturbations by this hypothetical third body on the mass transfer rate of such CVs. We made sure that the observed and calculated amplitude of variability was comparable too. The mass of the third body satisfying all constrains range from 0.63 to 97 Jupiter masses. Our results show further evidence supporting the hypothesis of a third body in three of these CVs, but only marginally in V1007 Her.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.