Paper detail

Testing the Peculiar Velocity Field predicted from Redshift Surveys

The reconstruction of the peculiar velocity field from the 1.936~Jy iras selected sample of galaxies is compared to a similar reconstruction from an optically selected sample. A general method for combining different samples to reconstruct a self-consistent density and peculiar velocity field is presented. The method is applied to determine how sensitive the derived peculiar velocity field is to the characteristics of the sample used. The possibility that the iras galaxies do not trace the general galaxy population is explored adopting a simple model of linear biasing between the iras and optical samples. We find that the velocity fields derived from the two samples are consistent, within the estimated shot noise error, for the case of no relative bias. This result suggests that the predicted peculiar velocity field based on iras samples is not sensitive to the sampling properties of iras galaxies. Combined with previous suggestion of a relative biasing of iras galaxies on small scales (about 5 h^-1Mpc), this result suggests scale dependent biasing.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.