Paper detail

Testing the homogeneity of the Universe using gamma-ray bursts

In this paper, we study the homogeneity of the GRB distribution using a subsample of the Greiner GRB catalogue, which contains 314 objects with redshift $0<z<2.5$ (244 of them discovered by the Swift GRB Mission). We try to reconcile the dilemma between the new observations and the current theory of structure formation and growth. To test the results against the possible biases in redshift determination and the incompleteness of the Greiner sample, we also apply our analysis to the 244 GRBs discovered by Swift and the subsample presented by the Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Host Galaxy Legacy Survey (SHOALS). The real space two-point correlation function (2PCF) of GRBs, $ξ(r),$ is calculated using a Landy-Szalay estimator. We perform a standard least-$χ^2$ fit to the measured 2PCFs of GRBs. We use the best-fit 2PCF to deduce a recently defined homogeneity scale. The homogeneity scale, $R_H$, is defined as the comoving radius of the sphere inside which the number of GRBs $N(<r)$ is proportional to $r^3$ within $1\%$, or equivalently above which the correlation dimension of the sample $D_2$ is within $1\%$ of $D_2=3$. For the Swift subsample of 244 GRBs, the correlation length and slope are $r_0= 387.51 \pm 132.75~h^{-1}$Mpc and $γ= 1.57\pm 0.65$ (at $1σ$ confidence level). The corresponding scale for a homogeneous distribution of GRBs is $r\geq 7,700~h^{-1}$Mpc. The results help to alleviate the tension between the new discovery of the excess clustering of GRBs and the cosmological principle of large-scale homogeneity. It implies that very massive structures in the relatively local Universe do not necessarily violate the cosmological principle and could conceivably be present.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.