Paper detail

Testing the equal-time angular-averaged consistency relation of the gravitational dynamics in N-body simulations

We explicitly test the equal-time consistency relation between the angular-averaged bispectrum and the power spectrum of the matter density field, employing a large suite of cosmological $N$-body simulations. This is the lowest-order version of the relations between $(\ell+n)$-point and $n$-point polyspectra, where one averages over the angles of $\ell$ soft modes. This relation depends on two wave numbers, $k'$ in the soft domain and $k$ in the hard domain. We show that it holds up to a good accuracy, when $k'/k\ll 1$ and $k'$ is in the linear regime, while the hard mode $k$ goes from linear ($0.1\,h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$) to nonlinear ($1.0\,h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$) scales. On scales $k\lesssim 0.4\,h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, we confirm the relation within the statistical error of the simulations (typically a few percent depending on the wave number), even though the bispectrum can already deviate from leading-order perturbation theory by more than $30\%$. We further examine the relation on smaller scales with higher resolution simulations. We find that the relation holds within the statistical error of the simulations at $z=1$, whereas we find deviations as large as $\sim 7\%$ at $k \sim 1.0\,h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ at $z=0.35$. We show that this can be explained partly by the breakdown of the approximation $Ω_\mathrm{m}/f^2\simeq1$ with supplemental simulations done in the Einstein-de Sitter background cosmology. We also estimate the impact of this approximation on the power spectrum and bispectrum.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.