Paper detail

Testing the effect of $H_0$ on $fσ_8$ tension using a Gaussian Process method

Using the $fσ_8(z)$ redshift space distortion (RSD) data, the $σ_8^0-Ω_m^0$ tension is studied utilizing a parameterization of growth rate $f(z) = Ω_m(z)^γ$. Here, $f(z)$ is derived from the expansion history $H(z)$ which is reconstructed from the observational Hubble data applying the Gaussian Process method. It is found that different priors of $H_0$ have great influences on the evolution curve of $H(z)$ and the constraint of $σ_8^0-Ω_m^0$. When using a larger $H_0$ prior, the low redshifts $H(z)$ deviate significantly from that of the $Λ$CDM model, which indicates that a dark energy model different from the cosmological constant can help to relax the $H_0$ tension problem. The tension between our best-fit values of $σ_8^0-Ω_m^0$ and that of the \textit{Planck} 2018 $Λ$CDM (PLA) will disappear (less than $1σ$) when taking a prior for $H_0$ obtained from PLA. Moreover, the tension exceeds $2σ$ level when applying the prior $H_0 = 73.52 \pm 1.62$ km/s/Mpc resulted from the Hubble Space Telescope photometry. By comparing the $S_8 -Ω_m^0$ planes of our method with the results from KV450+DES-Y1, we find that using our method and applying the RSD data may be helpful to break the parameter degeneracies.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.