Paper detail

Testing subhalo abundance matching from redshift-space clustering

We present a first application of the subhalo abundance matching (SHAM) method to describe the redshift-space clustering of galaxies including the non-linear redshift-space distortion, i.e., the Fingers-of-God. We find that the standard SHAM connecting the luminosity of galaxies to the maximum circular velocity of subhalos well reproduces the luminosity dependence of redshift-space clustering of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey in a wide range of scales from 0.3 to 40 Mpc/h. The result indicates that the SHAM approach is very promising for establishing a theoretical model of redshift-space galaxy clustering without additional parameters. We also test color abundance matching using two different proxies for colors: subhalo age and local dark matter density following the method by Masaki et al. (2013b). Observed clustering of red galaxies exhibits much stronger Fingers-of-God effect than blue galaxies. We find that the subhalo age model describes the observed color-dependent redshift-space clustering much better than the local dark matter density model. The result infers that the age of subhalos is a key ingredient to determine the color of galaxies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.