Paper detail

Testing standard perturbation theory and the Eulerian local biasing scheme against N-body simulations

We test third-order standard perturbation theory (SPT) as an approximation to non-linear cosmological structure formation. A novel approach is used to numerically calculate the three-dimensional dark matter density field using SPT from the initial conditions of two high-resolution cosmological simulations. The calculated density field is compared to the non-linear dark matter field of the simulations both point-by-point and statistically. For smoothing scales above 8 Mpc/h it shows a good agreement up to redshift 0. We present a simple fitting formula to relate the linear and non-linear density contrast that accurately recovers the non-linear time evolution for 0 <= z <= 10 at the per cent level. To address the problem of biasing between the matter field and the haloes identified in the simulation, we employ the Eulerian local bias model (ELB), including non-linear bias up to the third order. The bias parameters are obtained by fitting a scatter plot of halo and matter density (both from the simulation and from SPT). Using these bias parameters, we can reconstruct the halo density field. We find that this reconstruction is not able to capture all the details of the halo distribution. We investigate how well the large scale bias can be described by a constant and if it corresponds to the linear bias parameter b_1 of the local bias model. We also discuss how well the halo-halo power spectrum and the halo-mass cross spectrum from the reconstructed halo density field agree with the corresponding statistics from the simulation. The results show that while SPT is an excellent approximation for the matter field for suitably large smoothing scales even at redshift 0, the ELB model can only account for some of the properties of the halo density field.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.