Paper detail

Testing solar surface flux transport models in the first days after active region emergence

Active regions (ARs) play an important role in the magnetic dynamics of the Sun. Solar surface flux transport models (SFTMs) are used to describe the evolution of the radial magnetic field at the solar surface. There is however uncertainty about using these models in the early stage of AR evolution. We aim to test the applicability of SFTMs in the first days after the emergence of ARs by comparing them with observations. The models we employ range from passive evolution to models where the inflows around ARs are included. We simulate the evolution of the surface magnetic field of 17 emerging active regions using a local surface flux transport simulation. We selected regions that do not form fully-fledged sunspots that exhibit moat flows. The simulation includes diffusion and advection. We use observed flows from local correlation tracking of solar granulation, as well as parametrizations of the inflows around ARs. To evaluate our simulations, we measure the cross correlation between the observed and the simulated magnetic field, as well as the total unsigned flux of the ARs, over time. We also test the validity of our simulations by varying the starting time relative to the emergence of flux. We find that the simulations using observed surface flows can reproduce the evolution of the observed magnetic flux. The effect of buffeting of the field by supergranulation can be described as a diffusion process. The SFTM is applicable after 90% of the peak total unsigned flux of the AR has emerged. Diffusivities in the range between $D=250$ to $720$ km$^2$/s are consistent with the evolution of the AR flux in the first five days after this time. We find that the converging flows around emerging ARs are not important for the evolution of the total flux of the AR in these first five days; their effect of increasing flux cancellation is balanced by the decrease of flux transport away from the AR.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.