Paper detail

Testing pre-main sequence models: the power of a Bayesian approach

Pre-main sequence (PMS) models provide invaluable tools for the study of star forming regions as they allow to assign masses and ages to young stars. Thus it is of primary importance to test the models against observations of PMS stars with dynamically determined mass. We developed a Bayesian method for testing the present generation of PMS models which allows for a quantitative comparison with observations, largely superseding the widely used isochrones and tracks qualitative superposition. Using the available PMS data we tested the newest PISA PMS models establishing their good agreement with the observations. The data cover a mass range from ~0.3 to ~3.1 Msun, temperatures from ~3x10^3 to ~1.2x10^4 K and luminosities from ~3x10^-2 to ~60 Lsun. Masses are correctly predicted within 20% of the observed values in most of the cases and for some of them the difference is as small as 5%. Nevertheless some discrepancies are also observed and critically discussed. By means of simulations, using typical observational errors, we evaluated the spread of log τ_sim - log τ_rec, i.e. simulated minus recovered ages distribution of the single objects. We also found that stars in binary systems simulated as coeval might be recovered as non coeval, due to observational errors. The actual fraction of fake non coevality is a complex function of the simulated ages, masses and mass ratios. We demonstrated that it is possible to recover the systems' ages with better precision than for single stars using the composite age-probability distribution, i.e. the product of the components' age distributions. Using this valuable tool we estimated the ages of the presently observed PMS binary systems.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.