Paper detail

Testing Positive Semi-Definiteness via Random Submatrices

We study the problem of testing whether a matrix $\mathbf{A} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ with bounded entries ($\|\mathbf{A}\|_\infty \leq 1$) is positive semi-definite (PSD), or $ε$-far in Euclidean distance from the PSD cone, meaning that $\min_{\mathbf{B} \succeq 0} \|\mathbf{A} - \mathbf{B}\|_F^2 > εn^2$, where $\mathbf{B} \succeq 0$ denotes that $\mathbf{B}$ is PSD. Our main algorithmic contribution is a non-adaptive tester which distinguishes between these cases using only $\tilde{O}(1/ε^4)$ queries to the entries of $\mathbf{A}$. If instead of the Euclidean norm we considered the distance in spectral norm, we obtain the "$\ell_\infty$-gap problem", where $\mathbf{A}$ is either PSD or satisfies $\min_{\mathbf{B}\succeq 0} \|\mathbf{A}- \mathbf{B}\|_2 > εn$. For this related problem, we give a $\tilde{O}(1/ε^2)$ query tester, which we show is optimal up to $\log(1/ε)$ factors. Our testers randomly sample a collection of principal submatrices and check whether these submatrices are PSD. Consequentially, our algorithms achieve one-sided error: whenever they output that $\mathbf{A}$ is not PSD, they return a certificate that $\mathbf{A}$ has negative eigenvalues. We complement our upper bound for PSD testing with Euclidean norm distance by giving a $\tildeΩ(1/ε^2)$ lower bound for any non-adaptive algorithm. Our lower bound construction is general, and can be used to derive lower bounds for a number of spectral testing problems. As an example of the applicability of our construction, we obtain a new $\tildeΩ(1/ε^4)$ sampling lower bound for testing the Schatten-$1$ norm with a $εn^{1.5}$ gap, extending a result of Balcan, Li, Woodruff, and Zhang [SODA'19]. In addition, it yields new sampling lower bounds for estimating the Ky-Fan Norm, and the cost of the best rank-$k$ approximation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.