Paper detail

Testing PDR models against ISO fine structure line data for extragalactic sources

Far-infrared [C ii] 158 micron, [O i] 145 micron and [O i] 63 micron fine structure emission line fluxes were measured from archival Infrared Space Observatory Long Wavelength Spectrometer spectra of 46 extragalactic sources, with 28 sources providing detections in all three lines. For 12 of the sources, the contribution to the [C ii] 158 micron line flux from H ii regions could be estimated from their detected [N ii] 122 micron line fluxes. The measured [C ii]/[O i] and [O i] 63/145 micron line flux ratios were compared with those from a grid of PDR models previously computed using the UCL PDR code. Persistent offsets between the observed and modelled line ratios could be partly attributed to the effects of [O i] 63 micron self-absorption. Using the SMMOL code, we calculated model [O i] line profiles and found that the strength of the [O i] 63 micron line was reduced by 20-80%, depending on the PDR parameters. We conclude that high PDR densities and radiation field strengths, coupled with the effects of [O i] 63 micron self-absorption, are likely to provide the best match to the observed line flux ratios.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.