Paper detail

Testing modified (Horndeski) gravity by combining intrinsic galaxyalignments with cosmic shear

We study the impact of modified gravity of the Horndeski class, on intrinsic shape correlations in cosmic shear surveys. As intrinsic shape correlations (IAs) are caused by tidal gravitational fields acting on galaxies as a collection of massive non-relativistic test particles, they are only sensitive to the gravitational potential, which forms in conjunction with the curvature perturbation. In contrast, the cosmic shear signal probes the sum of these two, i.e. both Bardeen-potentials. Combining these probes therefore constitutes a test of gravity, derived from a single measurement. Focusing on linear scales and alignments of elliptical galaxies, we study the impact on inference of the braiding $\hatα_B$ and the time evolution of the Planck mass $\hatα_M$ by treating IAs as a genuine signal contributing to the overall ellipticity correlation. We find that for \textsc{Euclid}, IAs can help to improve constraints on modified gravity of the Horndeski-class by 10 per cent if the alignment parameter needed for the linear alignment model is provided by simulations. If, however, the IA needs to be self calibrated, all of the sensitivity is put into the inference of the alignment strength $D$ since there is a very strong correlation with the evolution of the Planck mass. Thus diminishing the benefit of IA for probing modified gravitational theories. While the present paper shows results mainly for modified gravity parameters, similar deductions can be drawn for the investigation of anisotropic stresses, parameterised modifications to the Poisson-equation, the phenomenology of gravitational slip and to breaking degeneracies in a standard cosmology.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.