Paper detail

Testing Mass Loss in Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheids using Infrared and Optical Observations

It has been claimed that Period-Luminosity relations derived from infrared observations of Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) Cepheids are less dependent on the metallicity of the Cepheids. In this work, infrared observations of LMC Cepheids from the SAGE survey are combined with OGLE II optical observation to model and predict mass-loss rates. The mass-loss rates are fit to the data and are predicted to range from about 10^{-12} to 10^{-7}M_\odot/yr; however, the rates depend on the assumed value of the dust-to-gas ratio. By comparing the relations derived from observations to the relations derived from predicted infrared stellar luminosities from the mass-loss model, it is shown mass loss affects the structure and scatter of the infrared Period-Luminosity relation. Mass loss produces shallower slopes of the infrared relations and a lower zero point. There is also evidence for non-linearity in the predicted Period-Luminosity relations, and it is argued that mass loss produces larger infrared excess at lower periods, which affects the slope and zero point, making the PL relations more linear in the wavelength range of 3.6 to 5.8 micron. Because the dust-to-gas ratio is metallicity dependent and mass loss may have a metallicity dependence, infrared Period-Luminosity relations have additional uncertainty due to metallicity.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.