Paper detail

Testing GRBs as Standard Candles

Several correlations among Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) observables with available redshifts have been recently identified. Proper evaluation and calibration of these correlations may facilitate the use of GRBs as standard candles constraining the expansion history of the universe up to redshifts of $z>6$. Here we use the 69 GRB dataset recently compiled by Schaefer (astro-ph/0612285) and we test the calibration of five of the above correlations ($1:\epkk-E_γ$, $2:\epkk-L$, $3:\tlag-L$, $4:V-L$, $5:\trt-L$) with respect to two potential sources of systematics: Evolution with redshift and cosmological model used in the calibration. In examining the model dependence we assume flat \lcdm and vary $\omm$. Our approach avoids the circularity problem of previous studies since we do not fix $\omm$ to find the correlation parameters. Instead we simultaneously minimize $χ^2$ with respect to both the log-linear correlation parameters $a$, $b$ and the cosmological parameter $\omm$. We find no statistically significant evidence for redshift dependence of $a$ and $b$ in any of the correlation relations tested. We also find that one of the five correlation relations tested ($\epkk-E_γ$) has a significantly lower intrinsic dispersion compared to the other correlations. For this correlation relation, the maximum likelihood method favors the existence of a cosmological constant while the other four correlation favor a flat matter dominated universe $\omm \simeq 1$. Finally, a cross-correlation analysis between the GRBs and SnIa data for various values of $\omm$ has shown that the $E_{peak}-E_γ$ relation traces well the SnIa redshift regime. However, even the tightest correlation relation ($E_{peak}-E_γ$) provides much weaker constraints on $\omm$ than current SnIa data.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.