Paper detail

Testing gravity theories using tensor perturbations

Primordial gravitational waves constitute a promising probe of the very early Universe and the laws of gravity. We study in this work changes to tensor-mode perturbations (TMPs) that can arise in various proposed modified gravity (MG) theories. These include additional friction effects, nonstandard dispersion relations involving a massive graviton, a modified speed, and a small-scale modification. We introduce a physically motivated parameterization of these effects and use current available data to obtain exclusion regions in the parameter spaces. Taking into account the foreground subtraction, we then perform a forecast analysis focusing on tensor-mode MG parameters as constrained by future experiments COrE, Stage-IV and PIXIE. For a fiducial value of the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r=0.01$, we find that an additional friction of $3.5\sim4.5\%$ compared to GR will be detected at $3$-$σ$ by these experiments, while a decrease in friction will be more difficult to detect. The speed of gravitational waves needs to be by $5\sim15\%$ different from the speed of light for detection. We find that the minimum detectable graviton mass is about $7.8\sim9.7\times 10^{-33}$ eV, which is of the same order of magnitude as the graviton mass that allows massive gravity theories to produce cosmic acceleration. Finally, we study TMPs in MG during inflation using our parameterization. We find that the tensor spectral index is related to $r$ and the friction parameter $ν_0$ by $n_T=-3ν_0-r/8$. Assuming that the friction parameter is unchanged throughout the history of the Universe and is much larger than $r$, future experiments will be able to distinguish this MG consistency relation from the standard inflation one, and thus can be used as a further test of MG. In summary, TMPs and cosmic-microwave-background B-mode polarization provide a complementary avenue to test gravity theories. (Abridged)

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.