Paper detail

Testing General Relativity: new measurements of gravitational redshift in galaxy clusters

The peculiar velocity distribution of cluster member galaxies provides a powerful tool to directly investigate the gravitational potentials within galaxy clusters and to test the gravity theory on megaparsec scales. We exploit spectroscopic galaxy and galaxy cluster samples extracted from the latest releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to derive new constraints on the gravity theory. We consider a spectroscopic sample of $3058$ galaxy clusters, with a maximum redshift of $0.5$. We analyse the velocity distribution of the cluster member galaxies to make new measurements of the gravitational redshift effect inside galaxy clusters. We accurately estimate the cluster centres, computing them as the average of angular positions and redshifts of the closest galaxies to the brightest cluster galaxies. We find that this centre definition provides a better estimation of the centre of the cluster gravitational potential wells, relative to simply assuming the brightest cluster galaxies as the cluster centres, as done in the past literature. We compare our measurements with the theoretical predictions of three different gravity theories: general relativity (GR), the $f(R)$ model, and the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) model. A new statistical procedure is used to fit the measured gravitational redshift signal and thus to discriminate among the considered gravity theories. Finally, we investigate the systematic uncertainties possibly affecting the analysis. We clearly detect the gravitational redshift effect in the exploited cluster member catalogue. We recover an integrated gravitational redshift signal of $-11.4 \pm 3.3$ km s$^{-1}$, which is in agreement, within the errors, with past literature works. Overall, our results are consistent with both GR and DGP predictions, while they are in marginal disagreement with the predictions of the considered $f(R)$ strong field model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.