Paper detail

Testing galaxy feedback models with the first resolved profiles of the circumgalactic medium

The hot ($>10^6$ K) phase of the circumgalactic medium (CGM) contains a large fraction of baryons in galaxies. It also retains signatures of the processes that shaped the galaxies, such as feedback from active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and supernovae, and offers a uniquely powerful way to constrain theoretical models of feedback. It is, however, notoriously difficult to detect. By stacking 2643 optically selected galaxies in the eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS), we present spatially resolved properties of the extended CGM in both star-forming and quiescent galaxies spanning an order of magnitude in stellar mass. We mask out resolved point sources and galaxy groups/clusters and model the contribution from X-ray binaries and the hot ISM, producing accurate radial profiles. We compare the profiles to mock X-ray observations of galaxy stacks in the IllustrisTNG100 (TNG) and EAGLE cosmological simulations. We detect extended emission from both the high-mass ($10.7<\log(M_*/M_\odot)<11.2$) and low-mass ($10.2<\log(M_*/M_\odot)<10.7$) galaxy stacks. Galaxies have somewhat more luminous CGM between $10-100$~kpc if they are more massive or star-forming. However, the luminosity increases slower with stellar mass than predicted in simulations. Simulated quenched galaxies are far dimmer than observed, suggesting that they rely too heavily on CGM ejection for quenching. Star-forming galaxies are observed to have flatter and more extended profiles than in simulations, suggesting under-efficient stellar feedback models. Our results highlight the need to modify future prescriptions of galaxy feedback models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.