Paper detail

Testing for shielding of special nuclear weapon materials

Nuclear-weapon-material detection via gamma-ray sensing is routinely applied, for example, in monitoring cross-border traffic. Natural or deliberate shielding both attenuates and distorts the shape of the gamma-ray spectra of specific radionuclides, thereby making such routine applications challenging. We develop a Lagrange multiplier (LM) test for shielding. A strong advantage of the LM test is that it only requires fitting a much simpler model that assumes no shielding. We show that, under the null hypothesis and some mild regularity conditions and as the detection time increases, LM test statistic for (composite) shielding is asymptotically Chi-square with the degree of freedom equal to the presumed number of shielding materials. We also derive the local power of the LM test. Extensive simulation studies suggest that the test is robust to the number and nature of the intervening materials, which owes to the fact that common intervening materials have broadly similar attenuation functions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.