Paper detail

Testing deviations from $Λ$CDM with growth rate measurements from 6 Large Scale Structure Surveys at $\mathbf{z=0.06}$ to 1

We use measurements from the Planck satellite mission and galaxy redshift surveys over the last decade to test three of the basic assumptions of the standard model of cosmology, $Λ$CDM: the spatial curvature of the universe, the nature of dark energy and the laws of gravity on large scales. We obtain improved constraints on several scenarios that violate one or more of these assumptions. We measure $w_0=-0.94\pm0.17$ (18\% measurement) and $1+w_a=1.16\pm0.36$ (31\% measurement) for models with a time-dependent equation of state, which is an improvement over current best constraints \citep{Aubourg2014}. In the context of modified gravity, we consider popular scalar tensor models as well as a parametrization of the growth factor. In the case of one-parameter $f(R)$ gravity models with a $Λ$CDM background, we constrain $B_0 < 1.36 \times 10^{-5} $ (1$σ$ C.L.), which is an improvement by a factor of 4 on the current best \citep{XU2015}. We provide the very first constraint on the coupling parameters of general scalar-tensor theory and stringent constraint on the only free coupling parameter of Chameleon models. We also derive constraints on extended Chameleon models, improving the constraint on the coupling by a factor of 6 on the current best \citep{Hojjati2011} . We also measure $γ= 0.612 \pm 0.072$ (11.7\% measurement) for growth index parametrization. We improve all the current constraints by combining results from various galaxy redshift surveys in a coherent way, which includes a careful treatment of scale-dependence introduced by modified gravity.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.