Paper detail

Testing cosmological models using relative mass-redshift abundance of SZ clusters

Recent detection of high-redshift, massive clusters through Sunyaev-Zel'dovich observations has opened up a new way to test cosmological models. It is known that detection of a single supermassive cluster at a very high redshift can rule out many cosmological models all together. However, since dealing with different observational biases makes it difficult to test the likeliness of the data assuming a cosmological model, most of the cluster data (except those with high mass-redshift) stays untouched in confronting cosmological models with cluster observations. We propose here that one can use the relative abundance of the clusters with different masses at different redshifts to test the likeliness of the data in the context of cosmological models. For this purpose we propose a simple parametric form for the efficiency of observing clusters at different mass-redshift and we test if the standard LCDM model can explain the observed abundance of the clusters using this efficiency parameterization. We argue that one cannot expect an unusual and highly parametric form of the efficiency function to fit the observed data assuming a theoretical model. Using many realizations of Monte Carlo simulations we show that the standard spatially flat LCDM model is barely consistent with the SPT cluster data using a simple and plausible two-dimensional efficiency function for detection of the clusters. More cluster data are needed to make any strong conclusion.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.