Paper detail

Testing convective-core overshooting using period spacings of dipole modes in red giants

Uncertainties on central mixing in main sequence (MS) and core He-burning (He-B) phases affect key predictions of stellar evolution such as late evolutionary phases, chemical enrichment, ages etc. We propose a test of the extension of extra-mixing in two relevant evolutionary phases based on period spacing Delta_P of solar-like oscillating giants. From stellar models and their corresponding adiabatic frequencies (respectively computed with ATON and LOSC codes) we provide the first predictions of the observable Delta_P for stars in the red giant branch (RGB) and in the red clump (RC). We find: i) a clear correlation between Delta_P and the mass of the helium core (M_He); the latter in intermediate-mass stars depends on the MS overshooting, hence it can be used to set constraints on extra mixing during MS when coupled with chemical composition; ii) a linear dependence of the average value of the asymptotic period spacing (<Delta_P>_a) during the He-B phase on the size of the convective core. A first comparison with the inferred asymptotic period spacing for Kepler RC stars suggests the need for extra mixing also during this phase, as evinced from other observational facts.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.