Paper detail

Testing consistency of $Ω_b h^2$ in the Planck data

We find that the cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization power spectra measurements from Planck constrain the parameter $Ω_bh^2$ mostly through: A) the amplitude of Thomson scattering and B) a factor that ensures Thomson scattering does not violate momentum conservation of the baryon-photon fluid. This allows us to obtain two distinct but comparably strong constraints on $Ω_b h^2$ from the Planck data alone. They are consistent, showing robustness of the Planck $Ω_b h^2$ constraint. We can alternatively rephrase these constraints as A) the change of the Thomson scattering cross section since recombination is less than $\sim 2\%$ and B) momentum during recombination is conserved to better than $\sim 2\%$ by Thomson scattering. Decoupling the eight various ways in which $Ω_b h^2$ affects the Planck data leads to $H_0$ only slightly higher than in the standard analysis, $(68.3 \pm 1.6)\,\mathrm{km/s/Mpc}$. The overall consistency of all $Ω_b h^2$ constraints does not suggest any problem with the standard cosmological model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.