Paper detail

Testing Cluster Structure of Graphs

We study the problem of recognizing the cluster structure of a graph in the framework of property testing in the bounded degree model. Given a parameter $\varepsilon$, a $d$-bounded degree graph is defined to be $(k, ϕ)$-clusterable, if it can be partitioned into no more than $k$ parts, such that the (inner) conductance of the induced subgraph on each part is at least $ϕ$ and the (outer) conductance of each part is at most $c_{d,k}\varepsilon^4ϕ^2$, where $c_{d,k}$ depends only on $d,k$. Our main result is a sublinear algorithm with the running time $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n}\cdot\mathrm{poly}(ϕ,k,1/\varepsilon))$ that takes as input a graph with maximum degree bounded by $d$, parameters $k$, $ϕ$, $\varepsilon$, and with probability at least $\frac23$, accepts the graph if it is $(k,ϕ)$-clusterable and rejects the graph if it is $\varepsilon$-far from $(k, ϕ^*)$-clusterable for $ϕ^* = c'_{d,k}\frac{ϕ^2 \varepsilon^4}{\log n}$, where $c'_{d,k}$ depends only on $d,k$. By the lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ on the number of queries needed for testing graph expansion, which corresponds to $k=1$ in our problem, our algorithm is asymptotically optimal up to polylogarithmic factors.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.