Paper detail

Testing black hole equatorial reflection symmetry using Sgr A* shadow images

The recently released images of the supermassive black holes in the M87 galaxy and the galaxy of our own make probing black hole spacetimes and testing general relativity (GR) possible. The violation of equatorial reflection symmetry of black hole spacetimes is clearly a smoking gun of physics beyond GR. In this paper, we place constraints on the violation of black hole reflection symmetry using the bounds on the ring size of the Sgr A* black hole images, which are consistent with the critical curve radius predicted in GR within $\sim10\%$. Adopting a theory-agnostic framework, we consider a Kerr-like metric in which the violation of reflection symmetry is parametrized by a single parameter, without altering the multipoles of the black hole. The critical curves are always vertically symmetric due to the existence of hidden symmetry associated with the Killing tensor, even though the spacetime is reflection asymmetric. We find that the size of critical curves is sensitive to the amount of reflection symmetry being violated, and place the first constraints on the parameter space of the model using the Sgr A* images.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.