Paper detail

Testing ansatze for Quasi-nonlinear Clustering: the linear APM power spectrum

We compare the accuracy of published formulae that transform the linear perturbation theory power spectrum into the nonlinear regime against the results of an ensemble of large N-body simulations. We find that the modified transformation given by Jain, Mo and White (1995) performs well for initial fluctuations that have a power law power spectrum, but is less succesful for scale dependent spectra. The inverse transformation to obtain the linear power spectrum is applied to the APM Galaxy Survey power spectrum measured by Baugh \& Efstathiou (1993). The resulting linear spectrum is used to generate the initial density fluctuations in an N-body simulation, which is evolved to match the measured APM amplitude on large scales. We find very good agreement between the final power spectrum of the simulation and the measured APM power spectrum. However, the higher moments for the particle distribution only match the ones recovered from the APM Survey on large scales, $R \simgt 10 \mpc$. On small scales, $R \simlt 10 \mpc$, the APM estimations give smaller amplitudes, indicating that non-gravitational effects, such as biasing, are important on those scales. Our approach can be used to constrain a model of how light from galaxies traces the underlying mass distribution.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.