Paper detail

Test Problems for Potential Field Source Surface Extrapolations of Solar and Stellar Magnetic Fields

The potential field source surface (PFSS) equations are commonly used to model the coronal magnetic field of the Sun and other stars. As with any computational model, solving equations using a numerical scheme introduces errors due to discretisation. We present a set of tests for quantifying these errors by taking advantage of analytic solutions to the PFSS equations when the input field is proportional to a single spherical harmonic. From the spherical harmonic solutions we derive analytic equations for magnetic field lines traced through the three dimensional magnetic field solution. We propose these as a set of standard analytic solutions that all PFSS solvers should be tested against to quantify their inherent errors. We apply these tests to the pfsspy software package, showing that it reproduces spherical harmonic solutions well with a slight overestimation of the unsigned open magnetic flux. It is also successful at reproducing analytic field line equations, with errors in field line footpoints typically much less than one degree.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.