Paper detail

Test of charge conjugation invariance in eta->pi0 e+e- and eta->pi+pi-pi0 decays

Charge conjugation C is one of the fundamental symmetries in nature which transforms particles into antiparticles. This symmetry was studied in weak interaction where it is fully violated, but it is poorly known in the strong and electromagnetic interactions. To this end, in this thesis we investigated eta->pi+pi-pi0 and eta->pi0 e+e- decays, which might violate charge conjugation symmetry. The violation of C symmetry in eta->pi+pi-pi0 process could manifest itself as an asymmetry between energy spectra of charged pions. The eta->pi0 e+e- decay is forbidden by C symmetry in the first order of electromagnetic interaction, with the branching ratio on a level of 10^-8. Therefore, observation of a larger branching ratio could indicate a mechanism involving first order electromagnetic interaction violating charge conjugation. Both decays were investigated by means of the WASA-at-COSY detector operating at the COSY synchrotron at the Forchungszentrum Julich in Germany. The eta meson was produced via pp->pp eta reaction at the proton beam momentum of 2.14GeV/c. In total around 5x10^7 eta mesons were collected. As a result of the analysis conducted in the framework of this thesis a Dalitz Plot distribution for the eta->pi+pi-pi0 decay was obtained. From this distribution we extracted asymmetry parameters sensitive to C symmetry violation for different isospin values of the final state and we have established that all are consistent with zero within the obtained accuracy. For the eta->pi0 e+e- decay we have not observe signal and thus we estimated an upper limit for the branching ratio. The established upper limit amounts to $BR(eta->pi0 e+e-)<3.7x10^-5 at the 90% confidence level. This result is more precise than previously obtained in other experiments.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.