Paper detail

Test of CDF dijet anomaly within the standard model

Dijet anomaly reported by the CDF (Collider Detector at Fermilab) collaboration in 1.96 TeV p-pbar collisions is investigated within the standard model by considering effects of parton distribution functions on various processes: W+dijet, Z+dijet, WW, ZW, and top production. Since the anomalous peak exists in the dijet-mass region of 140 GeV with the p-pbar center-of-mass energy sqrt{s}=1.96 TeV, a relevant momentum fraction x of partons is roughly 0.1. In this x region, recent HERMES semi-inclusive charged-lepton scattering experiment indicated that the strange-quark distribution could be very different from a conventional one, which has been used for many years, based on opposite-sign dimuon measurements in neutrino-induced deep inelastic scattering. We investigated effects of such variations in the strange-quark distribution s(x) on the anomaly. We found that distributions of W+dijets and other process are affected by the strange-quark modifications in wide dijet-mass regions including the 140 GeV one. Since the CDF anomaly was observed in the shoulder region of the dijet-mass distribution, a slight modification of the distribution shape could explain at least partially the CDF excess. Therefore, it is important to consider such effects within the standard model for judging whether the CDF anomaly indicates new physics beyond the standard model. We also show modification effects of the strange-quark distribution in the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) kinematics, where cross sections are sensitive to a smaller-x region of s(x).

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.