Paper detail

Test of Analysis Method for Top-Antitop Production and Decay Events

We have carried out Monte Carlo calculations on two sets of randomly generated QCD events due to $p\bar{p} \to t \bar{t}$ with top mass $m_t = 170$ GeV, one set leading to $e^+e^-$ or $e^{\pm}μ^{\mp}$ or $μ^+μ^-$ 2jets (dilepton) and the other leading to $e^{\pm}$ or $μ^{\pm}$ 4jets (unilepton) configurations, in order to test the likelihood methods we have proposed for determining the top mass by analyses of these two sets of configurations. For the set of unilepton events, our method gives a very efficient and quite sharp measure of the top mass lying several GeV below the input mass. For the dilepton set, our method gives a much broader and markedly asymmetric distribution for the top mass estimates, 75% of them lying below 170 GeV, but the dilepton data will have much lower background than unilepton data. We then illustrate these methods by applying them to the data available from CDF in 1995 and discuss the results obtained in relation to the results for the sets of Monte Carlo events. The dilepton events yield masses spread widely, over 140 to 180 GeV, generally lower than the unilepton events, which cluster around $175\pm 8$ GeV. In an appendix, we discuss the nature of the additional ``slow'' $μ^{+}$ observed in one CDF dilepton event, concluding that it is most probably a ``tertiary lepton'' resulting from the decay sequence $b\to c + hadrons$, followed by $c\to s μ^{+} ν$.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.